Renault - Nissan

Related Essays

  • Renault Nissan Renault Nissan. Renault/Nissan: A Successful Partnership by Robert Lewis (20 Jun 04) In 1999, when Renault paid €5 billion to bu...
  • Nissan Renault Nissan renault. Renault Nissan Partnership In 1999, Renault bought a controlling interest in Nissan at 44% of the shares. This mer...
  • Cars ... RELATED LINKS • Renault-Nissan and Bajaj take on Tata's Nano • Tata's little car makes big impact Ian Fletcher, of Global...
  • Daimler Crysler Case ... came in the picture. As described in the Renault-Nissan case, a merger can be compared to marriage. When a young couple contemplates ...
  • Presentation Of The Merge Between Renault Coorporation And Nissan ... ... really explains why this alliance has been successful, as Carlos Ghosn has been one of the principal actors of the merge between Renault and...

Renault - Nissan

Renault - Nissan

Issue Identified in the Scenario

The issue is how two companies with different cultures can come together to form a cohesive partnership that creates a win-win situation for both.

How the company responded to the issue

"Nissan and Renault have managed to make their seven-year-old partnership succeed. In so doing they offer lessons in global partnerships that might be copied by other industries. Not a merger or a joint venture, their model is something totally different: an intimate relationship that allows each company to remain independent." (Muller, 2006)

According to the article "Secrets of a Happy Marriage" (Muller, 2006) the partnership has been successful because they have adapted the following business practices:
• Don't force it
• Don't fix it if you don't have to
• Avoid too many cooks
• Everybody wins, or nobody plays
• Talk, talk, talk

DON'T FORCE IT
The easiest way to kill an alliance is to force people to work together

DON'T FIX IT IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO
Sometimes, eliminating complexity just isn't worth the trouble.

AVOID TOO MANY COOKS
Collaboration has its limitations when you want to invent something new. Better to agree on common specs, then let one company design the part

EVERYBODY WINS, OR NOBODY PLAYS
Friction between the two companies isn't unknown, but Ghosn vows that no decision will be made that benefits one partner at the expense of the other.

TALK, TALK, TALK
Renault and Nissan try to keep their exchanges informal and flexible. But without some structure, chaos would ensue. Committees meet regularly to dig for joint savings and make sure the companies aren't duplicating efforts.
If one side of the Renault-Nissan amalgam doesn't like a particular plan to cooperate, it can just say no —...

View Full Essay

  • Submitted by: tschaub
  • Date Submitted: 08/13/2007 10:37 AM
  • Category: Business
  • Words: 426
  • Pages: 2
  • Views: 132
  • Popularity Rank: 2734

View Full Essay

Want More?

Thousands of students trust FratFiles.com for help with their writing. Shouldn't you?

Join Now